
SBI Funds Management shares listed below grey market expectations on Tuesday, opening at a premium of 6.85% on the National Stock Exchange.
The AMC’s stock debuted at Rs 613.30, compared to the IPO price of Rs 574, while it started at Rs 610 on the Bombay Stock Exchange. This performance gave the company a market capitalization of Rs 1.24 lakh crore at the start of trading.
Analysts noted that the listing price fell short of grey market expectations. Before the shares went public, unlisted stock was trading with a premium of 16-18%. Despite the modest gap, the IPO saw robust demand from investors.
The issue, launched between July 14 and July 16, was subscribed nearly 42 times. Qualified Institutional Buyers led the charge, subscribing their quota more than 140 times. Non-Institutional Investors subscribed 22.5 times, while Retail Individual Investors subscribed nearly 4 times.
The company raised Rs 9,795 crore through an offer for sale of 17.10 crore shares by existing shareholders State Bank of India and Amundi. Since there was no fresh issue, the funds went entirely to the selling shareholders.
Related: File ITR to Get Tax Refund Online
Before the debut, Emkay Global Financial Services initiated coverage with a ‘Buy’ call and a target price of Rs 750. This implies 31% upside from the IPO price. The brokerage highlighted SBI’s brand and distribution network as a key strength.
Equirus Securities also offered a ‘Long’ rating with a March 2027 target of Rs 675. This implies about 18% upside. The firm pointed to the company’s strong franchise, scale, and sticky Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) flows as reasons for the positive outlook.
Original perspective on the situation suggests that for an individual investor, the small gap between the IPO price and the listing price often feels like a missed opportunity. However, the brokerage reports indicate that the true value of the asset manager may not be realized immediately through stock price movements. The analysts are betting on the underlying business growth—specifically the shift of household savings into mutual funds—rather than a quick pop in share value. This creates a scenario where holding the shares might be more beneficial for long-term gains than booking small listing profits.
Geetanjali Kedia, an IPO expert at SPTulsian Investment Advisers, advised investors to decide based on their holding period. She suggested booking profits for short-term investors but holding the stock for one to two years for healthy returns. Vaqarjaved Khan of Angel One agreed, recommending that allotted shareholders hold the stock due to its strong fundamentals and margins. He added that fresh investors should avoid buying at raised post-listing levels.